We provide free tools to help you pre-analyze your smart contract. This way, you can test your smart contract security and get a preliminary rating of the code quality.
The Technology section concentrates on analyzing the security of smart contracts. We focus on vulnerabilities, code bugs, and functions that developers could optimize. An average rating is given to determine the total technological risk for the entire vertical, including numerous criteria.
Our technology audit allows you to scan a contract for vulnerabilities and bugs instantly. The scan goes through the on-chain smart contracts detecting more than 70 potential issues such as reentrancy, integer under-/overflow, suicidal, etc. The issues are categorized by impact and confidence, and users can download an audit report.
The field "Tokenomics" analyses the economics carefully behind a token. Here we focus on fairness for the community, specifically a user that will buy and use the token. Among token allocation and on-chain token metrics, we will also observe activity in real-time to provide alerts to our users, e.g., when the cliff of a release schedule runs out. An average rating is given to determine the total tokenomics risk for the entire vertical, including numerous criteria.
With our token allocation analysis, we examine the fairness of the community by comparing private allocations with public allocations. Please notify us if you are missing a group that cannot be properly assigned elsewhere. This model is still being optimized and is presently being tested.
Cliff and vesting are analyzed to evaluate the private side's selling pressure. Cliff is rated higher than vesting since no coins are issued. Users will later get notifications when their cliff and vesting periods expire.
The field of "Finance" is probably the most relatable to users as it comes from the traditional financial audit approach. We examine the financial health, considering its holdings and revenue generation.
Financial Risks, such as market risk, should be identified and managed effectively. An average rating is given to determine the total finance risk for the entire vertical, including numerous criteria.
The field "Operations" covers processes, procedures, and systems within the project. We concentrate on high-risk activities and determine their impact. Projects should control actions such as accessing the treasury wallet with sophisticated processes and a multi-signature wallet in place. More signers and a high percentage of confirming addresses can lead to less risk of collusion. An average rating is given to determine the total operational risk for the entire vertical, including other factors.
You can add any wallet maintained by the project here. The tool examines whether collusion or fraud exists. The rating depends on the percentage of approvals needed, the number of EOAs, and the number of total multisig owners. If no multi-sig wallet is used, the grade will be lower since everything relies on one individual's actions, who may lose access.
The ranking is based on activity and interaction on tweets posted in the last 24 hours. We get the latest 24 hours tweets and count the number of likes, comments, and retweets depending on the user's Twitter handle. This count is used to calculate the formula-based rating.
